The Mu Security Research Team released advisory “MU-200802-01â€? today. Details: Mu-200802-01
Author: Adam Bozanich
Widespread DH Implementation Weakness: Conspiracy or Ignorance?
While developing an implementation of IKE for our platform, I noticed an astonishing behavior in the servers I was testing against: Not a single IKE implementation, which included products from the biggest names in network infrastructure, were validating the Diffie-Hellman public keys that I sent. A consequence of this is that any deployment of these servers will allow the disclosure of secret information when a peer is in collusion with a passive attacker.
Tomahawk patch for routed network testing
We have added some options to the Tomahawk network testing tool which allows for testing of routed networks.
Consider the following topology ( A1 and A2 are network interfaces on a box running tomahawk ):
[A1] +----------+
|
| ip = 192.168.1.254
| mac = aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa
|
[ DUT ]
|
| mac = bb:bb:bb:bb:bb:bb
| ip = 10.0.0.1
|
[A2] +----------+
When replaying an ip conversation, packets coming from A1 destined for A2 must have the destination IP address be within the subnet that contains A2 ( 10.0.0.0 ), and a destination MAC address of the router’s interface which is on the same network as A1 (aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa).
We have added 4 options to tomahawk to enable testing in this scenario. In the descriptions below, “client” and “server” refer to the interfaces specified by the -I and -J tomahawk options respectively ( and the examples assume “-I A1 -J A2″ ).
-x
-y
-X
-Y
The -Y and -X options only use the two most significant bytes when re-writing the packet ip addresses.
USAGE:
Apply patch and build:
download tomahawk
download tomahawk.patch
tar -xvf tomahawk1.1.tar
cd tomahawk1.1
patch -p1 < ../tomahawk_patch.txt
Then build tomahawk as normal.
Example:
tomahawk -i eth0 -j eth1 -x aa:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa -y bb:bb:bb:bb:bb:bb -X 10.0.0.0 -Y 192.168.0.0 -l 1 -f test.pcap
Format String Vulnerability in Ekiga
The Mu Security Research Team released advisory “MU-200702-01″ today. Details: http://labs.musecurity.com/advisories/MU-200702-01.txt
